<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><item><title>MSN Local Search</title><description>Microsoft has to take off their blinders, and start looking at previous offerings before offering something new.&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Their MSN Toolbar implementation is inferior to every other tabbed browser implementation already available, and now they've introduced their &lt;A href="http://search.msn.com/local"&gt;MSN Local Search beta&lt;/A&gt; with scrollable aerial maps, and it's nowhere near as good as Google Maps.&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;I mean, what's the point of releasing something later than the competition, that's not as good?&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Why do I say it's not as good?&lt;BR&gt;&#13;
&lt;UL&gt;&#13;
&lt;LI&gt;It's slower.&lt;BR&gt;&#13;
&lt;LI&gt;The window is tiny.&amp;nbsp; A maximized browser on my 1600x1200 desktop shows a map that takes up maybe 20% of the browser window; the Google version uses about 80% of the browser window.&lt;BR&gt;&#13;
&lt;LI&gt;It only covers the US (I'm in Canada).&lt;BR&gt;&#13;
&lt;LI&gt;The satellite images are black &amp;amp; white, and very dark (Google is in colour).&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;I like they way they overlay the search results, and highlight them as you mouseover the search hits, but in every other way I can tell, Google's got em beat.&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Admittedly this isn't the "Virtual Earth", a project they haven't released yet, but it's the first time time the world gets to see their next generation mapping technology.&amp;nbsp; I wish they'd presented it better.&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;</description><pubDate>Thu, 01 Sep 2005 19:17:09 GMT</pubDate></item>